Over the summer the Tax Tribunal decision in the McLaren Formula One cheating fine case has been overturned in HM Revenue & Customs favour. It appears odd that this has been little reported in the press given the heavy reporting of the original decision, but to quickly remind you of the facts, McLaren were handed out a hefty £32 million penalty for breaking the motorsport governing bodies rules when it was found that one of their employees had used questionable methods to obtain technical information relating to another teams car.

McLaren’s team accountants had claimed the penalty as a deductible expense against tax. Originally the first tier tax tribunal decided that the penalty was an allowable expense, the argument being essentially that unlike a civil or criminal penalty which must be paid in order for the individual to avoid personal consequences, this penalty was paid to enable McLaren to continue to compete in Formula One thereby protecting the ongoing trade.

Worryingly, the recent about-face by the upper tier tribunal appears at face value to be a moral decision rather than a factual one, based largely on the principle that cheating isn’t right and therefore shouldn’t be condoned through use of tax allowances.

Whilst generally speaking I would applaud anything that encourages good moral behaviour in all walks of life, I am concerned that in this instance the comparison between a penalty within the tight confines of a sporting framework and a civil or criminal penalty is inappropriate and may be leading to a dangerous precedent.

Rules and penalties in sport are all part of the game being played and not part of our criminal or civil code. If we accept that a sport can be a taxable activity then the costs of playing that sport should be taken into account in arriving at the taxable profits. McLaren were not prosecuted for criminal behaviour, they just broke the rules of their sport and were dealt with appropriately within the confines of that sport. For the taxman to wade into the argument is just wrong no matter how unsporting they may think McLaren have been. I wonder how many people would think it appropriate for a police officer to walk onto a rugby pitch to arrest a player for throwing a punch in a scrum?

0

The information in this article was correct at the date it was first published.

However it is of a generic nature and cannot constitute advice. Specific advice should be sought before any action taken.

If you would like to discuss how this applies to you, we would be delighted to talk to you. Please make contact with the author on the details shown below.

Comment on this...

Richard Verge - Tax Director

E: rverge@goodmanjones.com

T: +44 (0)20 7874 8856

View Richard's Linkedin profile

Richard is a personal tax expert and is able to advise high net worth individuals on either immediate tax concerns or a long term plan to ensure that their affairs are structured to take advantage of the tax reliefs available.

His experience from working with HMRC ensures that he is more than adept at understanding the view from the other side, to the benefit of his clients. Richard advises entrepreneurs, owners of family businesses and partners in professional practices and provides advice on planning from both a personal and worklife perspective.

Share your thoughts

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

All fields are required