Tag Archives: trustees

The New Trusts Register – What trustees need to know

As part of a wider drive against tax evasion, on 26 June 2017 the UK implemented the EU’s 4th Anti-Money Laundering directive. Amongst other things, this took aim at trusts in the form of a compulsory register administered by HMRC. All trusts, no matter where they are in the world, must considering whether they are obliged to register, whether or not they already report under an existing regime. This includes pension funds and charitable trusts.

What do the new rules entail?

The new anti-money laundering rules create two overlapping obligations:

1. Trustees must report information to HMRC on all trusts worldwide for any tax year in which there is a “UK tax consequence”; and
2. Trustees must retain up-to-date records of beneficial ownership, whether or not there is a UK tax consequence.

This article will concentrate on the first obligation: the trusts register.

How does the trust register work?

The reporting is done online, via HMRC’s trusts registration service. Information must be reported each year, with deadlines akin to tax return filing. A good rule of thumb is that if a trust requires a UK tax return it will require a report under the trust register by the same 31 January deadline, although the definition of “UK tax consequence” is wider than this (see below). Trusts which do not have a UK tax consequence do not need to report, but if they have done so in a previous tax year a nil return will be required.

Which trusts have to report?

All trusts (both onshore and offshore) will have to report if there is a “UK tax consequence”, being where the trustees have a liability to UK tax. This will usually be where a UK trust tax return must be filed, but it also applies to inheritance tax and stamp duty on land and shares.

Bare trusts and interest in possession trusts where all income is mandated to the beneficiaries escape the reporting requirement as the trustees do not have a liability to UK tax. However, HMRC have confirmed to us that charitable trusts and pension funds fall within the rules as they are governed by trust deeds, insofar as the trustees are liable to tax.

What needs to be reported?

The information required is extensive, including:

• Details of the settlors, trustees and named beneficiaries (including full names, dates of birth and tax reference numbers or, where not available, their residential address).
• The name of the trust and the date it was established.
• Where the trust is treated as tax resident and where it is administered.
• The name of any advisers being paid to provide legal, financial, or tax advice to the trustees.

HMRC guidance has confirmed that the declaration of assets is not as onerous as originally feared.  For new trusts it will be whatever is settled when the trust is established, but for existing trusts only a nominal sum needs to be reported.

Who needs to report it?

The obligation is with the trustees, although agents can file on their behalf. Failure to report can result in up to two years in jail.

When is the first deadline?

HMRC’s trusts registration service performs two functions:

1. To fulfil the Anti-Money Laundering directive; and
2. As a replacement for the old form 41G for registering for tax reporting.

Therefore, two initial deadlines apply:

1. For trusts already registered with HMRC using old form 41G, with a UK tax consequence in 2016/17 (even if subsequently liquidated) the deadline is 31 January 2018.  However, due to issues with HMRC’s systems,  no penalties will be incurred for reports filed by 5 March 2018.
2. For trusts settled in 2016/17 or which first became liable to tax in that year, the usual registration deadline of 5 October 2017 has been extended to 5 January 2018.

What does all this mean?

The trust register represents unprecedented exposure for all of those involved with trusts, be they settlors, beneficiaries or even professional advisers. In particular, it places a heavy burden on trustees and will increase the costs of administering trusts.

 

Are the best things in life still free?

“The willingness of those who run charities to give their time freely for the benefit of others and not for their own financial reward” is the reason given by the Charity Commission to the question – what makes Charities distinctive? So does the suggestion by Lord Hodgson in his 2012 Review of the Charities Act that “large” Charities (those with income over £1m)  should have the automatic power to pay trustees – do away with this fundamental voluntary principle?

It is a question which has provoked much debate across the third sector. Attending the recent ICAEW Charity and Voluntary Sector Group Annual Conference I heard the question raised once more. So why has this proved such a divisive issue? What is it we fear from paid Trustees?

Paying Trustees is in fact nothing new, indeed as Sam Younger, Chief Executive of the Charity Commission, pointed out at that very conference; many Trustees receive payments, albeit with permission from the Charity Commission. The Commission’s guidance notes CC11 ‘Trustee expenses and payments’ – provides excellent advice on how this may be done, not only for reimbursed expenses but also payment for services provided and even payment for Trusteeship Duties. So if even the Charity regulator does not have a problem with payment for the provision of Trustee duties – who could object? A large body of opinion, if the legion of third sector forums is anything to go by!

Would Trustees still have the interests of the beneficiaries at heart if they were being paid – would they not have greater allegiance to those that pay them? This somewhat cynical view does not necessarily follow. If a CEO of a Charity were to be a paid Trustee, for example, would he or she be any less driven to act for the good of the beneficiaries? I think not. In fact it seems to me to make perfect sense that the person who is trusted to run the charity from an operational and very often from a strategic standpoint is also part of the Board that has the legal responsibility for those decisions.

This would also have the effect of reducing “them and us” situations between a Board and the management, providing for better and more effective buy in on decisions.

A recent poll reported in ‘Third Sector’ found that 67% of the sample was opposed to Lord Hodgson’s proposal. From my reading online this seems an accurate split. But I am shocked at the vehemence of the argument against paying Trustees. Lord Hodgson does not advocate the compulsory payment of all Charity Trustees, in his own estimate; it would affect about 3% of Charities. Even here it is only the power to automatically pay Trustees that is being recommended not the obligation.

In my work at Goodman Jones, I come across many talented and dedicated Trustees who provide valuable voluntary support for their chosen Charity; should they be disadvantaged in comparison to those who work in the Commercial sector, purely because of a historical legacy?

Do we really value something we get for nothing?