Tag Archives: hmrc

HMRC to run the Nation’s Payrolls!

The latest bit of blue-sky thinking from HMRC is how wonderful everything would be if it ran the payrolls of all the businesses in the land. No more coding notices, P45’s, P35’s, etc etc, PAYE and NIC liabilities settled by Direct Debit – a paradise of efficient tax management.

One has to wonder, what planet are they on? This is the organisation that, when it loses data, does it in spades, runs a bureaucracy where those within it don’t know what their colleagues are doing, whose Complaints Division writes letters stating “The Online Customer Service Team is committed to providing high-quality services” but then ignores the complaint itself, whose most senior official doesn’t acknowledge failings within his department identified by all and sundry – I could go on, but you get the drift.

Anyone in business in the real world knows just how crucial it is that employees are paid the right amount at the right time. Whatever else you do in business, you don’t play fast and loose with employees’ pay. If there’s an error, it’s today’s problem, not tomorrow’s. You don’t park it on a backburner in the corner, you prioritise it right now and get it sorted.

Picture the scenario – HMRC’s National Payroll Administration system goes live online. As the employer you register for it, and await with baited breath the arrival of the Activation Code. Why an Activation Code? – because that’s the tried and tested mechanism HMRC has adopted for VAT Online Services. Seven business days pass, no Activation Code – you call the Helpline. You hang on for 10 minutes listening to the latest completely irrelevant prerecorded message you can’t escape, then the message telling you about HMRC’s wonderful Online Services accessible at www.hmrc.gov.uk, and eventually, if you’re very lucky, you get to speak to a real person – who tells you to reapply – online. Seven more days – no code. Try the Helpline again, they don’t know what the problem is, they never do – this goes on for weeks. Eventually you find out that somewhere within the bowels of bureaucracy, someone has flagged your business as a “missing trader” – this occurs if a letter addressed to your business is returned to HMRC – AND NO-ONE AT HMRC HAS NOTICED THE FLAG!!

Let’s assume you eventually do get enrolled for the service. You then upload your data – staff details, gross pay, commissions due, Student Loan deduction, AVC’s, expenses reimbursement – where do you put expenses reimbursement? It isn’t there, HMRC didn’t think your payroll may do more than just take off tax and National Insurance. So you have to change your well-established structures to accommodate the limitations within HMRC’s so-called blanket coverage.

Eventually everything gets entered, the payroll gets processed – and a queue of aggrieved employees forms outside your door. One by one they troop in, show you their e-payslips – they’re wrong, wrong, wrong! But how can you deal with it? You can’t pop down to your payroll administrator / HR person and get an answer, because the error seems to have occurred within the system – HMRC’s system, not yours. It’s back to the Helpdesk – who advise you to write to their Complaints Team – who send you a letter saying “The Online Customer Service Team is committed to providing high-quality services” but ignore your complaint ……….

Remember those paintings by Hieronymous Bosch? The ones that look like Bedlam? He’d have a field day with this.

Taxing employment – risky or necessary?

The rates of national insurance (NIC) paid by employers and employees are all going to rise by 1% from April 2011. People earning less than £20,000 will be immune. Unlike income tax, NIC discriminates between employed and self-employed with lower rates for the self-employed.

The changes are estimated to yield an additional £6.5 billion between 2011 and 2013. This dwarfs the £550 million expected to be raised by the much publicized one-off bank bonus tax.

For example, an employee earning the mean UK salary (full time £31,323), the total cost of employment would be £34,600 in 2009-10. If net pay increased by 2.9% (forecast RPI) for 2011-12 total cost would be £36,428. This means a 5.3% increase in employment costs to allow an inflationary increase in net pay.

Unemployment is expected still to peak at 3 million (9.6%), so businesses should be encouraged to take on staff, this will certainly not!

 

The rates of national insurance (NIC) paid by employers and employees are all going to rise by 1% from April 2011. People earning less than £20,000 will be immune. Unlike income tax, NIC discriminates between employed and self-employed with lower rates for the self-employed.

The changes are estimated to yield an additional £6.5 billion between 2011 and 2013. This dwarfs the £550 million expected to be raised by the much publicized one-off bank bonus tax.

For example, an employee earning the mean UK salary (full time £31,323), the total cost of employment would be £34,600 in 2009-10. If net pay increased by 2.9% (forecast RPI) for 2011-12 total cost would be £36,428. This means a 5.3% increase in employment costs to allow an inflationary increase in net pay.

Unemployment is expected still to peak at 3 million (9.6%), so businesses should be encouraged to take on staff, this will certainly not!

The recent US November unemployment figures showed a fall from 10.2% to 10.0% and spurred consumer and investor confidence, although some dismissed it as a blip. Therefore, employment is pivotal to the economic recovery.

Overall, raising NIC will have a detrimental effect on the recovery and may stifle some “green shoots”. This is a view shared by many business leaders – Richard Lambert, CBI Director-General, said “The Chancellor has made a serious mistake imposing an extra jobs tax when the economy is still fragile.” and David Frost, Director General of the British Chambers of Commerce, “The NIC rises mean a brake on employment growth. While everyone understands the importance of restoring the public finances to a sustainable path, a tax on jobs in not the way to do it.”

However, with borrowing of £176bn predicted for 2010-11, net debt at 65% of GDP and a promise to protect frontline services, the money has to come from somewhere. A rise in VAT beyond 17.5% was mooted but not announced – this has problems as it’s not a progressive tax and consumers are unable to reclaim it, so would hit the poorest. Darling is in a corner!

In the face of the mind-boggling borrowing figures, one can imagine how he thinks the rise fits the precarious balancing act of voters, borrowing and economic recovery performed at 11 Downing Street. Unfortunately, tax on jobs is a risky option.

Whether it dangerously cools the job market or is ever even enacted – only time will tell.

Construction Industry Scheme and Gross Payment Status

Following on from Graeme’s post about the Time to Pay arrangements.

Are you in the Construction Industry? Have you got Gross Payment status? If you have, you’ll know how valuable that status is, and you’ll be well aware that losing that status could lead to a loss of up to 20% of cash inflow. And that would be terminal for many businesses.

In these difficult times of slowing customer payments and restricted funding from banks, it’s easy to allow PAYE and Corporation Tax payments to take a back seat to other creditors. But if you do you could be putting your Gross Payment status at risk.

Under its recently published “Time to Pay” scheme, the Inland Revenue has clarified that businesses entering into an arrangement under it will not lose their gross payment status.

But it’s vital the business agrees the Time to Pay arrangement before payment is due, not after. And whilst there is still a risk that the “computer” will send out automatic notices of revocation, the Inland Revenue has also confirmed these will be cancelled on immediate appeal.

So the message is – use the scheme or lose the status.

The Business Payment Support Service

One announcement of the Pre-budget report of 25 November was a new service for businesses in temporary financial difficulty that were unable to pay their tax bills. They would be able to spread their bills over a timetable they could negotiate with the business support service of HMRC. This service would cover all taxes paid by the business, including Corporation Tax, VAT, PAYE, Income Tax and National Insurance Contributions. Although interest would be charged on late paid tax it is anticipated that this rate would be lower than that of bank borrowing.

A key requirement is that contact is made with the business payment support service’s helpline before the due date of payment of the tax. The helpline would only be able to deal with requests in advance of the tax being due. If approach is made after the due date then it would not be dealt with by the helpline, but rather by the local tax district dealing with the business’ tax affairs. The local district may be less sympathetic than the dedicated helpline.

Since November, HMRC have issued guidance on the operation of the service. The guidance is welcomed as it covers some very practical matters, such as mechanism where a partnership (or partner of a partnership) is experiencing cash flow problems.

Two particular matters within the guidance that caught my eye were the review of agreements and the interaction with the Construction Industry Scheme (CIS).
The guidance accepts that a payment agreement may be negotiated in good faith but the taxpayer then experiences unexpected, further, cash flow problems and who cannot meet the agreed payment profile. HMRC will consider such circumstances on a case by case basis. Again, the key is to notify HMRC of the further problems before a payment is due.

CIS allows certain contractors in the construction industry to receive payments gross of tax. There are very strict conditions to be able to qualify for gross payments. The guidance confirms that negotiation of a payment profile with HMRC will not deny “gross status”. This is a welcome confirmation as receipt of invoices net of tax can only exasperate a cash flow problem.
In the round the business support service is a welcome announcement and HMRC have issued some helpful guidance. Well done!