enveloped dwellings Archives - London Chartered Accountants Blog

So another World Cup match ends in penalties with the Netherlands suffering the curse of the English in last night’s game against Argentina, and I suppose it was almost inevitable that both teams would play a cat and mouse game after seeing what Joachim Low’s men did to both Brazil’s national team and its national pride the previous night.

And I can’t help thinking that penalties (of the fiscal kind) will be another inevitability for the future given the UK Government’s recent announcements to “Low”er (Sorry, I couldn’t resist that) the threshold for reporting Enveloped Dwellings from £2,000,000 to £500,000. This is part of the relatively new Annual Tax on Enveloped Dwellings regime (“ATED”)

In outline terms, the ATED rules require that high value residential property held within a corporate (or non-natural person) structure will be subject to a number of measures to combat anti-avoidance. These range from a higher rate of Stamp Duty Land Tax (SDLT) (15%) to the Annual Tax itself, assessed by reference to the valuation band in which the property sits.

In fact, “assessed” is the wrong word to use here because the ATED tax is actually based on self-assessment. It is up to the taxpayer, in this case most likely the property owner, to assess their liability and submit a return accordingly. Now the vast majority of my clients will be eligible for one of the various reliefs on the basis that they are either letting the property or developing it for resale, so does that get them off the hook?

Well, yes and no. Whilst they’ll have no tax liability they still have an obligation to file the return and that’s where penalties could come into play. Furthermore, the return appears at first glance to be an annual return but there is in fact an additional obligation to submit an ATED return 30 days after acquiring an eligible property, or 90 days after the creation of a new property. It’s worth adding at this point that a separate ATED Return must be completed for each individual Enveloped Property.

So back to penalties. The ATED penalty regime is heavy – a £100 fixed penalty for being late by a day, followed by a £10 per day fine for each of the next 90 days and then a further £300 once 6 months have passed and so on.

But let’s be practical, Enveloped Properties valued at over £2m are not that common and so one could say that at present the non-compliance risk for developers and investors, who let’s face it have a myriad of other things to contend with when acquiring properties or completing developments, is not so great.

However, next year the £2m threshold falls to £1m, and the year after it falls to £500,000. This gives an exponential increase in the number of ATED returns required, and inevitably an increase in the number of property owners falling foul of their filing obligations

And, just like all World Cup games that end up in penalties, it will seem very unfair to those on the receiving end.

Property investors generally look for growth in the value of their assets, so how could that growth bring them into a charge to tax that they did not expect?

Well, first some context – according to the UK Land Registry, the average house price in the Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea increased from £490,000 in 2003 to £1,078,000 in 2013. That’s an increase of more than double in a 10 year period. If that rate of growth continued, it would mean that a property currently worth around £900,000 in that Borough would be worth £2m in 2023.

No doubt, this is one of the reasons why there is a well-trodden path towards UK property investment, and it would look like this trend is set to continue. Savills, for example, have recently issued their forecast for house prices Savills 5-year house price forecast. They forecast growth of up to 25% in the next 5 years across the UK as a whole, so parts of the country could be far in excess of that.

Now to ownership structures. The options for the structure in which property is owned are numerous and there are a variety of tax and non-tax issues to consider. The relative importance of each will be different to each individual investor.

It is essential to consider the ownership structure from the outset as Stamp Duty Land Tax rates of up to 15% make it costly to change afterwards. The need to take advice is clear, but what if that advice suggests ownership in a corporate vehicle?

Much has already been written about the tax rules which apply to properties worth more than £2m, and owned in a corporate vehicle (enveloped dwellings). In a nutshell, the rules include a headline Stamp Duty Land Tax rate of 15%, Capital Gains Tax charges for properties sold using such vehicles and an Annual Tax charge dependent upon value.

Properties costing less than £2m are currently outside of this regime, and many investors are buying such properties – so what does the “anti-avoidance” legislation hold in store for them?

Well, HMRC have launched a consultation to explore the possibility of extending the capital gains tax aspects of the “over £2m” rules, so that they apply to lower value properties held in corporate vehicles.

The outcome of this consultation cannot be predicted, but my view is that HMRC are looking to squeeze as many properties into this taxation regime as possible. Time will tell if they do, but even if HMRC don’t pass new legislation, we can be reasonably confident that, growth in property values will at some point push many more properties into the “over £2m” rules.

Given that investors in property invariably seek capital gains, this may in time prove to be a fly in the ointment for many. However, until then it just adds one more factor to consider when deciding upon property ownership structures; whether you are a UK taxpayer or not.