Author Archives: Richard Verge - Tax Director

About Richard Verge - Tax Director

T: +44 (0)20 7874 8856

View Richard's Linkedin profile

Richard is a personal tax expert and is able to advise high net worth individuals on either immediate tax concerns or a long term plan to ensure that their affairs are structured to take advantage of the tax reliefs available.

His experience from working with HMRC ensures that he is more than adept at understanding the view from the other side, to the benefit of his clients. Richard advises entrepreneurs, owners of family businesses and partners in professional practices and provides advice on planning from both a personal and worklife perspective.

An inherent problem with P11d completion is that the individuals who know the business sufficiently well to have access to all necessary information may not have the technical knowledge to know what is relevant for the completion of the forms. Furthermore, the range of possible entries required on a P11D is so wide that without a detailed knowledge of a business it can be difficult for your accountant to identify all of the potential P11d items without undergoing a full inspection of the business records. For this reason items frequently get missed from P11d’s and examination of P11d’s is a major focus of attention for HMRC PAYE compliance visit.

Below are five examples of things that I often see missed from P11d’s.

1. Directors loan accounts and expenses

The information required to establish whether there are any relevant director expenses or indeed if directors have been borrowing money from the company won’t necessarily be apparent from the day to day records of the company. Often only the directors themselves will have that knowledge yet the individuals responsible for preparing the P11d information may not know what questions to ask or feel they have the authority to interrogate their bosses regarding the detail of their expenses. This can be a particular issue for the smaller owner managed business which won’t have the more extensive accounting functions available to larger firms. The extent and nature of the directors’ loan accounts and expenses may not be established until the year end accounts are prepared which may be some months after the P11d filing deadline.

2. Assets Transferred to Employees

The transfer of assets to an employee is a taxable benefit equal to the market value of the asset at the time of transfer. Company cars and laptops are assets which I frequently see being transferred, but putting a value on those assets is a more difficult task than simply taking the written down book value. Second had car value can vary widely depending on the condition of the vehicle and hence it is advisable to keep evidence of the state of the vehicle to support any valuation in the event of an HMRC compliance visit which may take place months or even in some cases years after the vehicle has been sold. With regard to laptops, arguably a second hand laptop has little, if any, value but again you should keep contemporary evidence to support any values used.

3. Employees Phones

Employers frequently provide mobile phones for their employees. The provision of a single mobile phone is not a taxable benefit regardless of whether there is any private use. This is one of the very few tax exempt perks that an employee can receive, but the exemption only applies to phones which are owned by the employer or where the contract is in the name of the employer. If the employee is reimbursed for using their own phone then a different tax treatment will apply and only identifiable business calls will be exempt. Frequently there will be no identifiable business calls at all as all calls will be covered under the monthly line rental. In this case HMRC will treat the whole expense as taxable in the hands of the employee.

4. Staff Entertaining

Most employers and employees are aware that staff entertaining is tax free up to £150 her head per year. However, this exemption only applies to annual functions such as Christmas parties or summer outings where all staff are invited. If, say, a manager takes his team out for a drink and is reimbursed the expense then that reimbursement is a taxable expense item to be included on the manager’s P11d!

5. Personal use of Employer’s Assets

Any asset made available to an employee for their personal use gives rise to a benefit in kind charge. The basic charge is 20% of the market value of the asset when it is first made available. Company laptops are probably the most common example of this but there is exemption from the charge where private use is merely incidental to the business use. The main problem here is less the calculation of the benefit but more a case of establishing when a benefit may have arisen. The bookkeeper will be looking primarily at transactions going through the bank statements and may have no idea that one or more employees may be allowed to use company assets.

In conclusion, the completion of forms P11d is a thankless task and will inevitably be prone to difficulties. If you are preparing the forms then please don’t be afraid to ask the awkward questions of the directors. If you are director responsible for signing off the P11ds then remember anything of any value received by an employee (which includes you) from their employer, regardless of whether it is in cash or in kind, then unless it has already been taxed through PAYE, the chances are it will need to go on a form P11d.

 

0

The information in this article was correct at the date it was first published.

However it is of a generic nature and cannot constitute advice. Specific advice should be sought before any action taken.

If you would like to discuss how this applies to you, we would be delighted to talk to you. Please make contact with the author on the details shown below.

Comment on this...

HM Revenue and Customs have issued a consultation document introducing the capital gains tax charge on non residents owning residential property in the UK which was proposed in the Autumn Statement.

Currently non-residents are not subject to capital gains tax. From April 2015 a new charge will apply to non-residents on gains arising on UK residential property after that date.

Tax will be charged at the same capital gains tax rates as for UK individuals of 18% or 28% depending on their level of income. Principal private residence relief will be available in limited circumstances, but as part of the proposals HMRC are considering removing the option to make a main residence election, not just for non-residents, but for all individuals.

The charge will apply to capital gains regardless of whether the property is rented out. This is different from the current Annual Tax on Enveloped Dwellings (ATED) charge which applies mainly to companies who own UK residential property, where relief from the charge is available for let properties.

The charge will not apply to UK residential properties held through a UK REIT or other collective investments scheme. This will be subject to a genuine diversity of ownership test to avoid small groups buying property jointly to avoid the charge.

To ensure compliance it is proposed that solicitors, accountants or other agents dealing with relevant sales will be required to withhold tax from the sales proceeds.

This is a major change for all non-residents owning UK residential property. Everyone falling into this category should be reviewing their tax position in advance of next April.

0

The information in this article was correct at the date it was first published.

However it is of a generic nature and cannot constitute advice. Specific advice should be sought before any action taken.

If you would like to discuss how this applies to you, we would be delighted to talk to you. Please make contact with the author on the details shown below.

Comment on this...

HMRC’s attitude to capital gains tax and residential property is changing and this change could potentially affect many home owners.

Currently an individual’s main residence is exempt from capital gains tax due to the generous main residence exemption commonly referred to as Principle Private Residence relief (PPR).

In most domestic property sales the relief will cover the entire capital gain on sale. If you own only one property which you have lived in throughout the period you have owned it then you will almost certainly qualify in full for PPR.

If you own more than one property or expect your period of ownership to be short or there have been periods of non-occupation then the situation is more complicated. PPR may only be partially available or in some cases not at all and you will need to plan carefully to maximise your chances of making a successful claim.

In the past HMRC has taken a light touch in deciding what constitutes a main residence for the purpose of PPR, often accepting that a property has been the main residence even when the actual periods of occupation or ownership have been short or where an intention to develop was apparent.

A number of recent tax cases have challenged the status quo with HMRC successfully seeking to deny PPR. The cases have generally focused on the intention to occupy as a main residence and the quality of occupation. Deciding factors have included property being actively marketed for sale throughout the period of occupation and living on site during development not being a sufficient quality of occupation.

I am often asked how long it is necessary to live in a property for it to qualify for main residence exemption, but it is clear from HMRC guidance and the case law that, as with many things in life, quality of occupation rather than quantity is the most important factor. Taking steps to ensure that post is directed to your property, that you appear on the electoral register, registering with a local doctor and actually moving your furniture in are more likely to lead to a successful claim than physically camping out at the property for any length of time.

Where PPR is due in full on a sale then it applies automatically and does not need to be claimed. This leads to most sales of domestic property not being declared at all on a self-assessment tax return. However, problems will arise for anyone failing to declare a sale in the mistaken belief that PPR will cover the whole of their gain when it is only partially due or not due at all.

HMRC can and do obtain details of all property sales in the UK from the Land Registry and are on the look out for undeclared gains. Should HMRC successfully challenge a claim to PPR then tax, interest and penalties will all become payable. It is therefore important that if you are in any doubt over the validity or quantum of your claim then full disclosure of the facts should be made.

0

The information in this article was correct at the date it was first published.

However it is of a generic nature and cannot constitute advice. Specific advice should be sought before any action taken.

If you would like to discuss how this applies to you, we would be delighted to talk to you. Please make contact with the author on the details shown below.

Comment on this...

HM Revenue and Customs are now entering stage two of their campaign to target second homeowners. True to their word, they are starting to chase landlords who have a second property and have failed to declare rental income and capital gains on sales.

The disclosure opportunity that I referred to in my April blog closed on 8 August and already we are seeing a marked increase in HMRC investigations targeting those who ignored this opportunity to bring their tax affairs up to date.

A question I often get asked as a tax practitioner is “How will the Tax Inspector find out about undeclared income?” The answer is that there are many different sources of information available to the Tax Inspector to help identify potentially undisclosed rental income. These include Land Registry records, information requests to letting agents and tenant deposit registers, to name but a few. Information sharing with overseas authorities is becoming increasingly common and we have also seen that HMRC Inspectors are increasingly making use of technology to help them, from the relatively low tech searching of the internet for property adverts to the higher tech use of demographic profiling to track likely areas and candidates for investigation.

My experience has been that a lot of individuals who are now finding themselves on the wrong end of an HMRC enquiry have got into trouble due to a head-in-the-sand approach to their tax obligations rather than a deliberate attempt to avoid paying their dues. However, HMRCs view is very much that, having given taxpayers an opportunity to disclose, they will now take a tough line with anyone who hasn’t come forward voluntarily.

If you find yourself receiving an enquiry letter from your local Tax Inspector or if you know you have income to declare, but don’t know what to do, then I encourage you to speak to your accountant as soon as possible. It is always better, as you will pay lower penalties, to disclose before HMRC comes calling. We have a great deal of experience in dealing with tax enquiries and investigations. If you need our help then please contact a member of our tax department.

0

The information in this article was correct at the date it was first published.

However it is of a generic nature and cannot constitute advice. Specific advice should be sought before any action taken.

If you would like to discuss how this applies to you, we would be delighted to talk to you. Please make contact with the author on the details shown below.

Comment on this...
  • Are you trading or investing?
  • Is your property held as trading stock or investments?
  • What are the consequences of changing from one to the other?

HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) acknowledge that property transactions, more than most are capable of being either trading or investment activity. Unfortunately there is no easy guidance for the land holding company or individual to determine which camp they fall into. HMRC say “A trading transaction is a deal rather than an investment” and go on to give some guidance on what factors they will take into account when trying to distinguish the trading status of a property business.

Factors that HMRC will take into account will include:

  • whether there has been any previous transactions and if so at what intervals
  • whether the way in which the transaction was organised was typical of a land dealer
  • whether a loan was necessary to fund the purchase and if so under what terms
  • the character of the land, was it suitable for long-term investment or ripe for immediate development?
  • the length of time that the land was held, and particularly, whether there might have been a prearranged sale.

The distinction between trading and investment activity is a question of fact and each case will stand or falls on its own merits. Significant emphasis is applied to the intention of the individual at the moment of the acquisition of the land and it is therefore important to retain evidence to prove what your intentions are.

It is also important to understand that where circumstances and intentions change, property held as trading stock can change to investment and vice versa. This can cause significant cash flow problems as a tax point will arise when there is no sale and hence no cash to pay the tax due.

Circumstances where a change takes place might include say a property developer who develops a property for sale but then decides to use it themselves, or conversely someone owning some land as an investment decides to start developing the land. In each case a deemed disposal at market value will take place giving rise to either a trading profit where the movement is from trading stock to investment or a capital gain where the movement is from investment to trading stock.

Again it is the facts that will decide the matter and evidence should be retained to support the facts. Property developments can be held for significant periods of time without changing their nature to investment provided there remains an intention to sell. Likewise significant amounts of development can take place on investment land without it being treated as a trade. HMRC make the following observations:

  • Development of infrastructure alone (for example, the division of land into plots, the construction of access roads, the installation of mains services) is not sufficient to demonstrate the appropriation of land, previously acquired as a capital asset, to stock in trade and does not automatically allow us to argue supervening trading. Such development merely enhances the value of the capital asset in the owners chosen market place – that of the developer/purchaser.
  • The obtaining of planning permission prior to sale does not, in itself, define a transaction as a trading transaction. It may however provide evidence of intention and thus add weight, in certain circumstances, to a trading argument.

There is less guidance available in circumstances where trading stock is used for non-trading purposes, but in a recent inheritance tax case Piercy v R & C Commissioners it was held that a property developer letting out developed property which he was unable to sell did not necessarily mean that the trading motive had changed.

If you are unsure of the status of your business or have any concerns regarding the above matters then please contact us and ask to speak to a member of our property team.

0

The information in this article was correct at the date it was first published.

However it is of a generic nature and cannot constitute advice. Specific advice should be sought before any action taken.

If you would like to discuss how this applies to you, we would be delighted to talk to you. Please make contact with the author on the details shown below.

Comment on this...

HMRC suspect that many sales of second homes are not being reported for tax purposes. They have used their extensive powers to obtain details of property sales both in the UK and abroad and are now inviting people to come forward to voluntarily disclose previously undeclared sales.

Most people are aware that they don’t have to pay any capital gains tax when they sell their home, but this is only due to a specific capital gains tax exemption for the main residence. If you sell a property which is not your main residence then tax will be payable on any increase in value over its original purchase cost.

The “Property Sales Campaign” is an opportunity to tell HMRC about previously undisclosed sales and to pay a lower rate of penalty than would otherwise apply if HMRC were to discover the undeclared amount themselves.

To take advantage of the campaign it is necessary to make a notification to HMRC by 8 August 2013 and then to submit a completed disclosure form along with the tax, interest and penalties due by 9 September.

If you think this may affect you and you would like further information or assistance in making a disclosure then please contact me.

0

The information in this article was correct at the date it was first published.

However it is of a generic nature and cannot constitute advice. Specific advice should be sought before any action taken.

If you would like to discuss how this applies to you, we would be delighted to talk to you. Please make contact with the author on the details shown below.

Comment on this...

Many employers like to give Christmas gifts to their employees to reward them for their effort throughout the year. Unfortunately HM Revenue and Customs will generally view such gifts as taxable in the hands of the employee.

The only instance where a gift is not taxable is if the Tax Inspector agrees that the benefit is of a trivial amount. HMRC’s manuals point out that there is no set monthly limit below which a benefit is deemed to be trivial. The manuals give examples of the sorts of items which they will not seek to tax. Examples given include “seasonal gifts such as a turkey, an ordinary bottle of wine or a box of chocolates”.

In deciding whether the gift is a trivial benefit or not it is necessary to consider the individual employee rather than the total cost. For example an employer with a large workforce could spend a lot of money giving small gifts to each employee. This would not alter the fact that the benefit might be trivial.

If the gift extends beyond one of the small items mentioned above, for example a case of wine or a Christmas hamper, then the Inspector will consider the cost and contents of the gift in deciding whether to agree the benefit is trivial.

You should also be aware that gifts of cash or items which can be readily converted into cash such as retail vouchers will not be considered a trivial benefit irrespective of their value.

If you want to give larger gifts to your employees but don’t want them to suffer a tax charge you can enter into a PAYE Settlement Agreement with HMRC to pay the tax on the employees behalf.

0

The information in this article was correct at the date it was first published.

However it is of a generic nature and cannot constitute advice. Specific advice should be sought before any action taken.

If you would like to discuss how this applies to you, we would be delighted to talk to you. Please make contact with the author on the details shown below.

Comment on this...

There are times when tax law appears to lead to strange results and at first glance that might appear to be so in the McLaren cheating fine case which was in the papers recently.

When I first heard that McLaren were to receive tax relief on their fine I thought that can’t be true, but having taken a closer look at the facts of the matter I have to accept that there is a good case to argue why this should be correct.

In many sporting arenas, pushing boundaries in order to win is all part of the sport. The line between acceptable innovation and cheating is a fine one especially in a technologically advance sport such as Formula 1.

McLaren’s accountants have argued that the penalty incurred by their team was a natural consequence of pursuing their business of winning Formula 1 races. Whilst they had been found to have broken the rules of the sport, they stress that the penalty was not imposed for breaking any of society’s laws.

Tax law states that in order for expenditure to be tax deductible in a business it needs to be incurred wholly and exclusively for the purpose of the trade. I am not sure of the detailed rules of Formula 1 but my assumption is that had McLaren not paid this fine they would have been excluded from continuing in the sport. Unlike a civil or criminal penalty which must be paid in order for the individual to avoid personal consequences, the argument goes that the only reason for McLaren to have paid this penalty was to continue to compete in formula 1. The expenditure would therefore be incurred wholly and exclusively for the purpose of the trade rather than any other purpose. As counter intuitive as it seems, I think they probably have a point.

0

The information in this article was correct at the date it was first published.

However it is of a generic nature and cannot constitute advice. Specific advice should be sought before any action taken.

If you would like to discuss how this applies to you, we would be delighted to talk to you. Please make contact with the author on the details shown below.

Comment on this...

HM Revenue and Customs are currently sending out letters to all high income claimants of child benefit advising them of changes which come into effect from 7 January 2013. As already discussed in an earlier blog, those affected will be couples where the higher earner has income in excess of £50,000 per year.

If you fall into this category then your entitlement to some or all of the benefit will be removed and you will be given the choice of either not claiming the benefit at all or claiming the benefit and then paying back any overpaid amount through your self-assessment tax return.

It is clear from recent press coverage that this subject has caused a lot emotional response. Views expressed range from those who think it morally wrong that wealthy individuals should be receiving any benefits to those who see child benefit as a just recognition of the contribution to society of bringing up children?

Whatever your view, the practical question is whether to forgo the benefit completely or to claim and pay back any overpayment?

If you know your income is going to exceed £60,000 there seems little point in claiming only to have to pay back the whole lot later. If you are in the middle ground with income between £50,000 and £60,000 you will remain entitled to some benefit, or your income may be not ascertainable until after the end of the tax year. Unlike income tax which can generally be sorted out after the year end, claims for benefits general can only be backdated three months. Waiting until after the end of the year will therefore be too late.

Leaving aside the moral arguments it would seem sensible to claim if you know your income will be less than £60,000 or are uncertain but think it may be. There may be circumstances where claiming is not the best approach. If for example you do not already submit a self-assessment tax return you will be required to complete one to declare any amount overclaimed and if you need the help of a tax agent then costs are likely to significantly eat into any benefit entitlement. Or, if you are the sort of person who spends the money you have then it may be difficult to find the funds to pay back any overpaid amount at later date.

One thing I can be certain of and that is as a recipient of child benefit myself, I have got used to the cheque landing in my bank account every month and I am not looking forward to losing it!

As always, if you have any queries regarding the above matter or are uncertain how it will affect you then please contact your usual client partner or a member of our tax team.

0

The information in this article was correct at the date it was first published.

However it is of a generic nature and cannot constitute advice. Specific advice should be sought before any action taken.

If you would like to discuss how this applies to you, we would be delighted to talk to you. Please make contact with the author on the details shown below.

Comment on this...

It’s almost that time of year again; Christmas parties, the X Factor and Strictly Come Dancing on the TV, and those television and radio adverts featuring Moira Stuart reminding us of the deadlines for submitting our tax returns.

If you have already been issued with a notice to complete a 2011/12 tax return you are probably already aware that you have until 31 October 2012 to submit a paper copy to HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC), and until the 31 January 2013 to file online.  But what do you do if you haven’t received a notice to complete a tax return, and you suspect that you should be preparing tax returns?

HMRC only issue tax returns to those already within the Self-Assessment system. This puts the onus on the individual to notify HMRC of any changes in their circumstances that require them to complete a tax return, and to register for Self-Assessment.

The deadline for registering for Self-Assessment is 5 October.  With this deadline less than a week away, it’s more important than ever that you check whether or not you should be within the Self-Assessment regime.

How do you determine whether or not you should complete a 2011/12 tax return?

HMRC have issued guidance on the reasons that an individual would be required to complete a tax return, and a detailed list can be obtained from the HMRC website.  However, some of the more common reasons include the following:

  • You were self-employed in the year (including members of partnerships)
  • You receive £10,000 or more from savings and investments
  • You receive £2,500 or more from untaxed savings and investments
  • You receive either £10,000 or more from property before the deduction of any expenses, or at least £2,500 after the deduction of expenses
  • You receive foreign income
  • Your annual income exceeds £100,000
  • You have a capital gains tax liability in the year

If you satisfy any of these criteria in 2011/12 and have not already been issued with a tax return, it’s more than likely that you will be required to register for Self-Assessment.

How do you register for Self-Assessment?

Once you have determined that you need to complete a 2011/12 tax return, the next step is to register for Self-Assessment.  This can be done in one of two ways:

The first method is to complete either form CWF1 (self-employed individuals) or SA1 (all other cases).  These forms can be downloaded from HMRC’s website by following the below links:

SA1 – http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/sa/forms/sa1.pdf

CWF1 – http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/forms/cwf1.pdf

Alternatively, you can contact the Self-Assessment Helpline on 0845 900 0444.  You will be asked to provide your National Insurance number and to explain why you believe you should be issued with a tax return.

If you have previously been within the Self-Assessment regime, you will have previously been assigned a Unique Taxpayer Reference (UTR).  This is a 10-digit reference number and can be found on correspondence received from HMRC.  It’s not necessary to have a note of your UTR to re-register for Self-Assessment, but locating this information may speed up the registration process and avoid the duplication of Self-Assessment records.

The normal deadline for the online submission of a 2011/12 tax return and the payment of any tax owing is the 31 January 2013, although a paper tax return can be submitted at any point up to the 31 October 2012.  However, where you have been issued with a tax return after 31 October 2012, you have three months from the date you received the notification from HMRC to submit your tax return (either on paper or online) without incurring late filing penalties.

What happens if you miss the 5 October deadline?

With effect from 2011/12, a new penalty regime is in place if you fail to register on time.

This penalty regime is based on late returns and potential lost revenue’ i.e. the amount of tax outstanding at the normal due date (31 January 2013). Therefore, if you miss the 5 October 2012 registration deadline, but still manage to submit a 2011/12 tax return and pay your tax liability by 31 January 2013, HMRC will not impose a penalty for late registration.

If you have any queries regarding any of the above, or require assistance with the registration process, please contact us.

0

The information in this article was correct at the date it was first published.

However it is of a generic nature and cannot constitute advice. Specific advice should be sought before any action taken.

If you would like to discuss how this applies to you, we would be delighted to talk to you. Please make contact with the author on the details shown below.

Comment on this...