I previously wrote on this blog a post suggesting that HMRC were keen to widen the net to bring more properties into the tax rules concerning residential property owned within a Limited company, or other “non-natural person” wrapper.<\/p>\n
I did some research at that time and concluded that with property price inflation, even if the rules were not changed, the day wouldn’t be too far away before many “modestly” priced London properties were worth over \u00a32m and therefore liable to the full range of tax measures.<\/p>\n
I needn’t have bothered! Whilst not completely out of the blue, one of the announcements made in yesterday’s budget was the reduction of the \u00a32m threshold to \u00a3500k for:<\/p>\n
– the 15% Stamp Duty Land Tax on acquisitions,
\n– the Annual Tax on Enveloped Dwellings (ATED) charge, and
\n– the liability to Capital Gains Tax at 28% on gains.<\/p>\n
The Stamp Duty Land Tax change is effective immediately, with the other two aspects following from 1 April 2016 onwards for properties worth between \u00a3500k and \u00a32m. An interim provision will bring properties worth between \u00a31m and \u00a32m into the ATED regime from 1 April 2015. Current proposals are for the ATED to be set at \u00a37,000 per annum for properties worth \u00a31m to \u00a32m, and \u00a33,500 per annum for those worth between \u00a3500k and \u00a31m.<\/p>\n
HMRC state that these new measures are designed to tackle tax avoidance and not damage commercial enterprises. The Chancellor also states an intention to bring back into use large numbers of property currently sitting empty, and I can’t argue that that isn’t a good idea. For these reasons I would expect reliefs will be available in the same way as the current reliefs for property businesses. We’ll know more when the Finance Bill is released.<\/p>\n
However, even though there may not be an actual tax impact on genuine property businesses, one cannot escape the fact that for many situations a Limited company is an attractive structure in which to acquire property. The regime as it currently operates is geared so that such property owners are presumed guilty of using their company for tax avoidance and liable for the taxes until they declare their innocence by submitting the annual ATED return, and claim one of the available reliefs. So that’s yet a further piece of annual compliance for the diary (together with a requirement to make various disclosures regarding values etc) and it comes with the usual threat of penalties for non-compliance.<\/p>\n
Now, given that one-bedroomed flats are commanding over \u00a3500k in parts of London, and according to thisismoney.co.uk, 50% of London homes are worth more than \u00a31m, this is not simply a “widening of the net” but more akin to sending a super-trawler up the Thames – and as Eric Cantona of Manchester United fame once said – “the seagulls follow the trawler because they think sardines will be thrown into the sea”!<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
I previously wrote on this blog a post suggesting that HMRC were keen to widen the net to bring more properties into the tax rules concerning residential property owned within a Limited company, or other “non-natural person” wrapper. I did some research at that time and concluded that with property price inflation, even if the[…] <\/p>\n